A Proposal for
HelixFlo
This proposal sets out Phase 1 of the HelixFlo development programme: an independent engineering audit and supplier engagement workstream that maps the pathway from the current design stage through to qualified mass production. Status: provisional, subject to the Engineering Review Call set out in Section 10.
HelixFlo & Nguyen Mechanical Systems
Nguyen Mechanical Systems is a California-based product business founded by Hoang (Wynn) Nguyen, a mechanical engineer with 25 years of medical device and Class III implant manufacturing experience and a track record of commercialising premium engineered products. HelixFlo is the company's first consumer product platform: a modular, premium shower filtration and hygiene system positioned distinctly from the commodity shower filter category.
The platform consists of three primary sub-assemblies. A reusable adapter that interfaces with the standard half-inch NPT residential shower pipe and is intended to remain in place as permanent infrastructure. A disposable filter cartridge with an internal helical flow geometry, multi-layer media including KDF and activated carbon, and an injection-moulded housing, replaced on an approximate three-to-six-month cycle. A reusable rain shower head, planned in round and square rainfall geometries with future variants, with removable nozzles engineered for routine cleaning and maintenance.
Architectural design is reported as 95 per cent complete. CAD (STEP), 2D engineering drawings with tolerances, and a bill of material are produced and will be shared with the Shield Works R&D team in advance of project confirmation. Wynn has explicitly stated that the design is locked at the functional level and that the remaining work is the cosmetic refinement and the housing connection mechanism (bayonet or quarter-turn), to be optimised with manufacturing partner input.
The commercial model is razor-and-blade: the housing system runs at a low or zero margin, with the disposable cartridge providing recurring revenue. Premium positioning, salesperson and influencer channels are already in place pending the first marketing samples.
C2W and Shield Works have been engaged to assess the current design independently, provide an expert manufacturing and engineering perspective across the three sub-assemblies, and map the pathway from the current design stage through to qualified mass production. This proposal covers Phase 1 of that programme, titled Engineering Validation, following the NDA already in place between our teams and the discovery call held with Wynn earlier this month.
This proposal is marked provisional. The scope and fee set out below are firm. A dedicated Engineering Review Call between Shield Works R&D and the Nguyen Mechanical Systems team is proposed as a no-cost gate before project confirmation, to align the Phase 1 emphasis against Wynn's real technical priorities, principally the cartridge manufacturability and sub-assembly architecture across the three components. See Section 10 for the suggested sequence.
Our Preliminary Read on the Product
Ahead of Phase 1 engagement, our team has completed an initial review of the brief, the discovery call notes, and the architectural description of the three sub-assemblies. CAD and BOM files will be reviewed on receipt. The following is not the full Phase 1 output, but it is the position from which our engineering work will start. Sharing it now signals where our focus will be.
Where quality, cost, and timeline are actually won or lost. In our view, five engineering areas drive most of how a premium modular shower filtration platform of this type performs, costs, and scales. These are the areas our Phase 1 engineering work will prioritise.
Multiple rain shower head geometries (round, square, future) sharing a common reusable adapter and a common cartridge architecture is the correct platform direction for a modular system at this price tier. Our working assumption going into Phase 1 is that the adapter and cartridge are shared across the family and the shower head geometries are variant-specific, with the variant tooling strategy phased rather than launched in parallel. Phase 1 will confirm which sub-assemblies are truly shared, where variant-specific tooling is required, and the recommended geometry to tool first based on commercial priority and tooling economics.
Programme Targets
The following reflects current working assumptions drawn from the provided brief, intake form, and discovery call notes. The pilot and first production run figures will be reconciled and validated through Phase 1.
Six Phase 1 Deliverables
Phase 1, Engineering Validation is the first paid engagement in the HelixFlo development programme. The work is engineering-led: an independent audit of the existing CAD and BOM, a focused engineering workstream on the cartridge manufacturability and sub-assembly architecture, a DFM, DFA, and DFX engineering assessment across all three sub-assemblies, supplier engineering engagement with indicative pricing, and a Development Roadmap that consolidates the output into a costed phase-by-phase pathway to qualified mass production manufacture.
Duration: approximately 4 to 6 working weeks from confirmation.
Phase 1 consists of the following six deliverables.
- Phase timelines and phase management costs across the full development programme.
- Shield Works resource allocations and core deliverables across sampling, development, design optimisation (full DFM, DFA, DFX), prototyping, pilot run manufacture, mass production, and scaled production.
- Consolidated written output of the Phase 1 engineering work, including the CAD and BOM audit findings, the cartridge manufacturability workstream output, and the DFX assessment.
- Component-level bill of materials with material specifications and qualified supplier direction.
- Mechanical engineering and DFM plan for the three sub-assemblies, including shared-platform and variant-specific tooling strategy for the shower head geometries.
- Cosmetic finishing plan across the three sub-assemblies with indicative cost direction.
- Filter media supply plan with qualified sources and incoming QC criteria.
- Prototyping and iteration plan with validation gates.
- Tooling strategy, variant phasing decisions, and indicative tooling investment budget.
- Pilot run manufacture plan with QC gating criteria.
- Mass production pathway and scaled production goals.
- Packaging direction and indicative packaging cost.
- Risk register with mitigations and owner assignments.
Preview of the Phase 1 to Pilot Production Envelope
The figures below are preliminary ranges produced from our initial review and our experience with multi-component premium consumer products manufactured in China. They are shared ahead of the Phase 1 Indicative Quotation so that the shape of the investment is clear from the outset. They will be firmed up, detailed, and locked against specific supplier quotes in the Phase 1 output.
| Stage | Scope | Timeline | Indicative fee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering refinement and DFM | CAD and BOM audit, DFM across three sub-assemblies, supplier drawings, finishing strategy | 4 to 6 weeks | $8,000 – $14,000 |
| Prototype build | First functional prototypes in target materials across adapter, cartridge, and one shower head geometry | 4 to 6 weeks | $6,000 – $12,000 |
| Prototype iteration (likely) | Second iteration on cartridge seal, finish quality, and any DFM-driven design changes | 3 to 4 weeks | $4,000 – $7,000 |
| Cartridge tooling | Injection mould for the cartridge housing including internal helical geometry | 8 to 12 weeks | $15,000 – $30,000 |
| Shower head tooling (per geometry) | Tooling per shower head geometry where injection-moulded components are used; metal fabrication tooling where applicable | 8 to 12 weeks | $8,000 – $18,000 each |
| Pilot run | Pilot production for final QC validation and marketing samples | 3 to 4 weeks | $4,000 – $7,000 |
| Development total (before mass production) | Indicative envelope across the three sub-assemblies, one shower head geometry tooled, single prototype iteration | approx. 5 to 7 months | $45,000 – $88,000 |
Ranges assume the three sub-assemblies tooled with one shower head geometry as the first variant, a single prototype iteration, and finishing delivered through our qualified supply chain as part of the all-in unit cost. Additional shower head geometries are staged sequentially and quoted against tooling at the time the variant is committed. The envelope above excludes filter media procurement, sample shipping, and any third-party testing or certification fees, which are addressed separately in Section 6.
The risks below will be carried into the Development Roadmap with quantified mitigations. Surfacing them now signals where our engineering focus will be during Phase 1.
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Primary mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Helical internal geometry on the cartridge raises moulding complexity, undercut, or ejection issues | Medium | High | Mouldability assessment in Phase 1; parting line, draft, and side action options analysed before tooling commitment |
| Cartridge sealing fails to meet residential shower pressure reliability | Medium | High | Sealing interface engineering as part of DFM; sealing geometry and elastomer selection validated at prototype stage in Phase 2 |
| Premium cosmetic finish on machined or cast metal parts inconsistent across batches | Medium | Medium | Finishing path locked in Phase 1; QC criteria integrated into incoming and outgoing inspection through our qualified supply chain |
| Multi-geometry shower head strategy drives tooling investment beyond the funded development envelope | Medium | Medium | Variant phasing strategy in Phase 1: which geometry to tool first, which to stage, what is genuinely shared across variants |
| Filter media supply variability (KDF, activated carbon) affecting product performance consistency | Low-medium | Medium | Qualification of named suppliers in Phase 1; supply agreement structure and incoming QC criteria defined in the Development Roadmap |
Indicative unit pricing is not included at this stage. Material, process, and finishing decisions across the three sub-assemblies materially affect per-unit cost and will not be locked until the Phase 1 work is complete. Unit pricing at multiple volume tiers will be delivered in the Phase 1 Supplier Engineering Shortlist and Indicative Quotation.
What Sits Outside Phase 1
The Phase 1 fee covers all six deliverables in Section 4, including engineering work, CAD and BOM audit, the cartridge manufacturability workstream, DFX assessment, supplier engagement, indicative quotation, and the Development Roadmap. The following are excluded and would be scoped and costed within the Development Roadmap itself or addressed through specialist external partners coordinated by Shield Works.
Once a supplier set is confirmed and production begins, C2W and Shield Works operate as Nguyen Mechanical Systems' manufacturing partner. Wynn receives a single unit cost for each HelixFlo sub-assembly and the full system that covers goods, assembly, quality control, supplier management, packaging, and logistics coordination. These are not billed as separate service fees. The Phase 1 Supplier Engineering Shortlist and Indicative Quotation is specifically designed to establish those unit costs with confidence before any production commitment is made.
Phase 1 Fee & Forward Commercials
How We Keep Phase 1 Honest
A Single Accountable Engineering & Manufacturing Partner
Phase 1 is delivered by the same group of companies that takes the product through to qualified mass production:
From Engineering Review Call to Phase 1 Delivery
This proposal is non-binding at this stage and is intended to give Wynn clarity on cost, structure, and what Phase 1 will actually produce. If you are happy with the direction, we can move to the Engineering Review Call at your convenience and proceed from there.
Best regards,
Mark Jacobs
CEO, C2W Group / Shield Works
May 2026