A Proposal for Kamuvan
Kamuvan Tapachula Industrial Platform
Understanding of the Assignment
Kamuvan Green Capital is developing an industrial processing platform in Tapachula, Chiapas, that transforms agricultural biomass, initially banana biomass, into liquid biofertilizer, regenerative growing substrate and recovered process water, with biochar and carbon-removal modules to follow. A significant share of the required machinery and process equipment is to be sourced from China.
Following our proposal of 24 July, Kamuvan has shared two technical packages: the Major Equipment datasheets covering nine primary categories, and the Secondary Equipment datasheets covering nineteen further categories. Together these define a program of 28 equipment categories with a combined indicative equipment value of approximately USD 1,365,000. The technical packages currently define the principal process equipment around a nominal 5 t/h configuration, with the production model and future operating expansion to be confirmed during the procurement-strategy stage.
Our read of the assignment is that this is a multi-package industrial equipment procurement program sourced across several specialist manufacturers and system integrators, and coordinated as one accountable program from supplier identification through to delivered, tested equipment. Success depends on separating real manufacturers from traders, normalizing quotations so they can be compared fairly, and holding disciplined QC and FAT gates so that nothing is treated as accepted simply because it has shipped.
One point of clarity up front. Kamuvan and its process engineers own the process design, mass balance and plant performance definition. Our role is to procure, verify and coordinate equipment against those specifications and against the RFQ criteria we agree with you. We do not take ownership of process design or guarantee overall plant performance. This keeps our independence clean and our accountability clear.
The value of the engagement. The value of this engagement is not simply finding Chinese equipment suppliers. It is giving Kamuvan an accountable China-side procurement and engineering structure across 28 categories, before substantial deposits are committed. We establish comparable technical and commercial baselines, verify who is actually capable of manufacturing the equipment, preserve contractual leverage through inspection and FAT gates, and maintain one controlled record of decisions, deviations and supplier obligations through to delivery and testing.
Scope: Equipment Categories
The nine primary categories are the high-criticality, high-capital equipment at the core of the biofertilizer and substrate lines. Indicative capital values below are taken from Kamuvan's datasheets and are shown for scope reference only; firm pricing is established through the RFQ process.
| # | Primary Category | Units | Indicative CAPEX (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Biomass shredder / defibrator | 1 | 35,000 |
| 2 | Screw press (juice extraction) | 2 | 170,000 |
| 3 | Nanofiltration unit (concentration) | 1 | 240,000 |
| 4 | Finished biofertilizer storage tanks | 1 system | 35,000 |
| 5 | Industrial fiber dryer | 1 | 120,000 |
| 6 | Thermal generator (heat source for dryer) | 1 | 40,000 |
| 7 | Hammer mill | 1 | 35,000 |
| 8 | Ribbon blender | 1 | 40,000 |
| 9 | Bagging line | 1 | 35,000 |
| Primary subtotal | 10 units | 750,000 |
Note on the nanofiltration unit. The nanofiltration skid is the single largest item and is central to the concentration step. It is also likely to be one of the longest-lead packages. We recommend a membrane pilot on a real banana press-sap sample before any firm purchase order, so that membrane performance is validated against the actual process fluid rather than assumed. The thermal generator is best quoted together with the dryer to ensure thermal compatibility.
The secondary package covers the balance of the equipment across the biofertilizer line, the substrate line, and the laboratory and infrastructure areas. It is more numerous but lower in complexity per item, and many units consolidate to a small number of multi-product suppliers. Indicative values from Kamuvan's datasheets are grouped by process area below.
| Process Area | Units | CAPEX (USD) | Line |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biomass reception and feeding | 3 | 45,000 | Biofertilizer |
| Juice extraction (transfer) | 2 | 25,000 | Biofertilizer |
| Filtration | 3 | 50,000 | Biofertilizer |
| Concentration (NF support) | 3 | 45,000 | Biofertilizer |
| Storage and stabilization | 2 | 40,000 | Biofertilizer |
| Formulation and packaging | 4 | 55,000 | Biofertilizer |
| Automation and control | 3 | 50,000 | Biofertilizer |
| Drying (support) | 2 | 30,000 | Substrate |
| Milling | 1 | 15,000 | Substrate |
| Screening and classification | 2 | 25,000 | Substrate |
| Mixing and formulation | 1 | 10,000 | Substrate |
| Packaging | 1 | 10,000 | Substrate |
| Storage and material handling | 2 | 35,000 | Substrate |
| Analytical laboratory | 6 | 46,000 | Labs |
| Product development laboratory | 4 | 50,000 | Labs |
| Microbiology platform | 4 | 35,000 | Labs |
| Greenhouse and validation | 3 | 30,000 | Labs |
| Digital infrastructure | 3 | 19,000 | Infrastructure |
| Secondary subtotal | 49 units | 615,000 |
Preliminary basis. The technical packages provide a strong basis for procurement planning and supplier engagement, but they are not yet a complete issued-for-purchase design basis. Many specifications, including pressures and temperatures, pump duties, tank capacities and geometry, material compatibility, thermal sizing, final utility conditions, instrumentation and layout interfaces, remain provisional engineering proposals in the datasheets. Stage 1 identifies the technical gaps and coordinates their closure with Kamuvan, its process engineers and prospective suppliers, so that RFQs can be made comparable and contractually enforceable.
Sourcing route per item. Not every secondary item is necessarily best sourced from China. As part of Stage 1 we recommend, for each item, whether it is best sourced in China, procured locally in Mexico, routed through a specialist integrator, or treated as facility works rather than an equipment purchase. The fixed fee covers this assessment and does not commit Kamuvan to sourcing every item from China.
Approach, Methodology and Deliverables
We run the engagement in five stages that map directly to the scope in your RFP. Stages overlap in practice: as early packages move into RFQ, later packages are still being prequalified. This is how we hold pace across a broad equipment set without losing control of any single package.
All durations are indicative and depend on how quickly technical information and quotations are released, supplier responsiveness, factory schedules and shipping windows. We progress every package at pace from day one.
| Stage | Indicative Timing |
|---|---|
| Stage 1: Strategy and prequalification | Weeks 1 to 4 from commencement (per package set) |
| Stage 2: RFQ and comparison | Rolling from Week 3, per package as specs are released |
| Stage 3: Factory-visit mission | Scheduled once priority packages are shortlisted, 7 to 10 day trip |
| Stage 4: QC, FAT, follow-up | Through the manufacturing window of each package |
| Stage 5: Logistics and SAT support | From initial supplier appointment through to delivered and tested equipment |
A central objective of the engagement, at Kamuvan's request, is to maximise the balanced production capacity and operating value obtained from the fixed equipment budget, rather than simply obtaining quotations for a predetermined list. The indicative datasheet values are treated as a confidential maximum budget envelope, not as target prices, and Kamuvan's budget is never disclosed to suppliers, so each manufacturer submits its genuine best technical and commercial proposal.
Stage 1 sets this framework and delivers the strategic baseline-versus-capacity-maximised direction. The detailed dual-configuration study, with balanced-system throughput modelling and cost-per-ton analysis, is carried out once real quotations are in and is set out as a separately authorised engineering deliverable in Section 8. The capacity that can ultimately be achieved is an output of this evaluation once suppliers, configurations, mass balances and utility requirements are assessed with Kamuvan's process engineer. We pursue meaningful capacity gains as a serious central objective, but do not guarantee a specific figure in advance.
Program Governance and Reporting
Kamuvan receives a clear and controlled reporting structure throughout the assignment, so the program is governed rather than merely coordinated:
All material supplier commitments, deviations, approvals and commercial changes are recorded in writing.
The program is managed in English, with native Spanish-language support available where required for key discussions, clarifications and coordination, provided by Jesus Romano.
Proposed Team and Delivery Structure
The Kamuvan program is led and delivered through the combined C2W Group and Shield Works operating structure, not through a single individual. Kamuvan gains access to executive engineering oversight, dedicated technical review, project management, purchasing support, supplier coordination and an established China-wide quality team.
We source and inspect across China's industrial regions and coordinate multi-region factory visits within a single trip. We have directly employed inspectors located across China, including Jiangsu and Shanghai, rather than dispatching every inspection from one base. This gives faster, lower-cost coverage than platform inspection firms and keeps our people close to the factories building your equipment.
Relevant Experience and Delivery Capability
For Kamuvan, the practical advantage of C2W is that supplier identification, technical review, commercial negotiation, manufacturing follow-up, quality control and shipment coordination sit within one established China operating structure. This avoids the fragmentation that normally arises when sourcing agents, freelance inspectors, engineering consultants and logistics providers are appointed separately.
C2W Group has operated continuously in China since 2005 and has completed more than 20,000 sourcing, manufacturing, engineering and quality-control assignments. Our 150-strong China team includes engineers, sourcing specialists, project managers, purchasing personnel and directly employed quality-control staff.
The Kamuvan assignment brings together capabilities that C2W has delivered repeatedly across industrial and technical programs, including:
The assignment is delivered through the combined C2W and Shield Works operating platform rather than through a single individual, giving Kamuvan executive engineering oversight, dedicated technical review, project management, purchasing support, supplier coordination and an established China-wide quality team, together with our 100,000 sq ft IP-secure precision facility in Zhuhai for FAT coordination, quality control and, where practical, multi-supplier consolidation and dispatch. Large machinery such as the screw presses, dryer and nanofiltration skid is generally FAT-witnessed and shipped from the manufacturer rather than routed through Zhuhai.
Client Confidentiality. Much of our work is completed under client confidentiality. We therefore do not disclose client identities or commercially sensitive details in an open proposal. We would be pleased to discuss our relevant operating capabilities and experience in greater detail during due diligence.
Independence, Transparency and Conflict-of-Interest Controls
We act on the buy side only. Our incentives are aligned with Kamuvan's, and we make our commercial model fully transparent.
Commercial Model
The model is built from clear professional fees mapped to the scope, plus a single transparent execution fee that applies only when equipment is purchased through C2W. It is designed to be predictable and fully disclosed.
Each fixed sourcing fee reflects the sourcing and prequalification effort for that package, not the capital value of the equipment. The nine primary categories are fewer in number but individually complex and bespoke: the screw presses, the nanofiltration skid and the fiber dryer each require deep technical vetting, custom RFQs and equipment-specific FAT criteria, so the effort per item is high. The secondary package contains more units across more process areas, but the items are lower in complexity and many consolidate to a small number of multi-product suppliers, so the effort per item is lower. These two effects offset, which is why both packages carry the same USD 15,000 fixed sourcing fee. The pricing is set on effort, transparently, rather than on equipment value.
The retainer funds the dedicated C2W team that manages RFQs, technical clarification, quotation comparison, supplier communication, negotiations, reporting, project coordination, QC and FAT planning, manufacturing follow-up, logistics coordination and SAT coordination. It is USD 7,500 per month while the primary set is the active scope, and steps up to USD 12,000 per month when the secondary package is also in active execution, reflecting the added supplier and coordination workload of the full 28-category program. It reverts as the program narrows toward close-out. The retainer commences only when Kamuvan authorises packages into active RFQ and supplier engagement. It is billed monthly and may be discontinued on 30 days' written notice. Any active supplier, RFQ, manufacturing or FAT workstreams are brought to an orderly agreed handover or close-out before termination.
Kamuvan chooses how equipment is purchased, and the choice determines whether the execution fee applies:
The retainer covers the management and coordination team under both routes. The execution fee is not a second management fee: it applies only where C2W handles the purchase itself, and it covers the transactional work and financial accountability of doing so.
| Fee | Covers | Amount (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Package Procurement Strategy and Prequalification | Fixed sourcing fee. Strategy, package grouping, integrator recommendation, roadmap and decision gates, supplier verification and documented shortlist across the nine primary categories | 15,000 fixed |
| Secondary Package Procurement Strategy and Prequalification | Fixed sourcing fee. Same scope of work across the nineteen secondary categories, run as a fast-follow workstream | 15,000 fixed |
| Ongoing Procurement and Coordination Retainer | Management and coordination team. Primary set active: 7,500 per month. Full program (primary plus secondary) active: steps up to 12,000 per month, reverting as the program narrows | 7,500 to 12,000 per month |
| China Factory-Visit Mission | Concentrated 7 to 10 day mission: itinerary, interpreter coordination, on-ground accompaniment, negotiation support, post-trip decision report | 6,500 plus travel at cost |
| Capacity Optimisation and Value Engineering Study (optional, authorised) | Sourya-led engineering deliverable produced once quotations are in: detailed compliant-baseline versus capacity-maximised configurations, balanced-system throughput, cost per installed ton and integration-risk analysis. Authorised by Kamuvan when the capacity-maximised evaluation is wanted | 15,000 fixed |
| Equipment Execution Fee (buy-through route only) | Applies only where equipment is purchased through C2W. Purchasing execution, supplier contracting, PO control, payment coordination, order-level accountability. Factory price and C2W fee shown separately | 5% on first 500,000; 4% on next 500,000; 3% above 1,000,000 cumulative FOB |
| QC inspections / FAT witnessing | Per man-day, onsite, approved in advance per instance | 400 per man-day plus travel |
| Factory audits | Per audit, approved in advance per instance | 700 per audit plus travel |
| Optional Mexico on-site SAT / commissioning | Only if Kamuvan wants C2W personnel on site in Tapachula | Quoted per instance |
| Factory samples, sample shipping, freight to Mexico | Pass-through, procured on Kamuvan's behalf | At cost with receipts |
| Fee | What It Covers |
|---|---|
| Package procurement strategy fees | Package strategy, market search, initial supplier qualification and the documented shortlist |
| Ongoing retainer | RFQs, technical clarification, comparison matrices, negotiation, project management, manufacturing coordination, reporting and supplier follow-up |
| Equipment execution fee (Route A) | C2W contracting and purchasing channel, financial administration, payment and currency handling, purchase-order liability and transactional accountability |
| Day rates | Physical factory attendance only: onsite QC inspection, FAT witnessing and audits |
FAT planning and supplier-document review sit within the retainer; physical FAT attendance and witnessing are charged per man-day; retesting following a supplier failure is separately approved.
Payment is made against C2W Group invoices by bank transfer.
Illustrative Program Cost Summary
The figures below are illustrative only. They are built on Kamuvan's own indicative CAPEX (approximately USD 1,365,000 across the 28 categories) to show the shape of the total C2W fees for the full program. Actual figures depend on program duration, the equipment actually purchased through C2W (Route A versus Route B), and the number of inspection and audit man-days approved.
| Component | Basis | Illustrative (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Package procurement strategy fees (primary + secondary) | Firm | 30,000 |
| China factory-visit mission | Firm, plus travel | 6,500 |
| Ongoing retainer | Illustrative 12-month blended profile, full-program rate only while both package sets are concurrently active | 90,000 to 120,000 |
| Equipment execution fee (Route A) | 5% first 500,000, 4% next 500,000, 3% above 1,000,000, on approx 1,365,000 FOB | Approx 56,000 |
| QC inspections, FAT witnessing, audits, travel | At day rates and cost, per approval | Variable |
| Capacity Optimisation and Value Engineering Study | Optional, authorised separately, outside the core estimate | 15,000 |
Based on the assumptions above, the known and estimated Route A fees comprise USD 30,000 in package procurement strategy fees, USD 6,500 for the China factory-visit mission, an estimated USD 90,000 to USD 120,000 in retainer fees over an illustrative 12-month program, and approximately USD 56,000 in execution fees if the full indicative equipment value is purchased through C2W. QC, FAT attendance, audits, travel and approved pass-through costs remain variable. Under Route B, the execution fee does not apply.
The optional Capacity Optimisation and Value Engineering Study (USD 15,000) sits outside these figures and is authorised only if Kamuvan wants the detailed capacity-maximised evaluation. Its purpose is to establish whether material additional capacity and operating value can be achieved within the same equipment budget, and to give Kamuvan a quantified basis for deciding whether the capacity-maximised configuration should proceed.
Sequencing: Primary and Secondary
We recommend the nine primary categories lead, with the secondary package following as a fast-follow workstream. The primary equipment is the critical, long-lead, high-capital set, and focusing resources there first protects the plant's core delivery path. The secondary package begins as primary suppliers lock, with individual secondary categories pulled forward wherever they are ready. If Kamuvan prefers, the secondary package can instead run fully in parallel from the start, in which case the retainer steps up to the combined rate earlier to resource the concurrent workload. Either way, both packages are covered by the same team, the same governance and the same commercial terms.
China Sourcing and Factory-Visit Mission
A concentrated 7 to 10 day mission is the fastest way to convert a shortlist into locked supplier decisions. We prepare it so Kamuvan's delegation spends its time in front of the right factories, not in logistics.
Immediate Availability and First-Week Actions
We are available to begin immediately following receipt of the applicable package procurement strategy payment. In the first week we would:
What We Need From Kamuvan to Begin
The two technical packages are already in hand. To move into Stage 1 we need the following:
We are comfortable starting with the current project framework and refining the procurement plan as this information is confirmed.
Why C2W Group and Shield Works
Section 6 sets out our capability and track record. In short, the reasons to appoint C2W for this program are:
Next Steps
This proposal is non-binding at this stage and is intended to give Kamuvan a clear view of our approach, team, transparency model and commercial structure for the full 28-category program. If Kamuvan is happy to proceed, the engagement commences on receipt of the primary package procurement strategy payment.
Best regards,
Mark Jacobs
CEO, C2W Group / Shield Works